Observations on Theology, Culture and the Hosier family

Friday, 30 November 2007

ANOTHER REASON TO MOVE TO POOLE


I was down in Poole yesterday and just managed to get to the beach long enough to take this picture.

FOOD 3: ETERNAL FOOD

Revelation 19:9 ‘Blessed are those who are invited to the wedding supper of the lamb’

Food will eternally remind us of God’s grace to us.

There won’t be hunger in heaven, and there won’t be the same physical need for food. But food will still be important.

Our human celebrations always involve food – when we want to celebrate, we eat. This is very obvious at Christmas, but it is true of every significant marker in our lives – birthdays, anniversaries, even funerals. And it is especially true of weddings. The catering arrangements at weddings in the UK are demanding enough, but in many other cultures they reach a different level of extravagance and significance. In cultures where food is generally scarcer, it is typical that there needs to be lots of food at a wedding, as a sign of the hosts prestige and generosity.

A friend from Zimbabwe told me about the scale of his wedding. Not only were his immediate family and friends invited, but they invited their friends and family, and they in turn brought others with them. The final guest roll numbered close to a thousand!

God has given us an invitation to the greatest celebration of all, the wedding supper of the lamb. At this party there will be lots of food! This will be a sign of the prestige and generosity of the master of the banquet – one who is able to feed us with eternal grace. And there is an invitation to everyone to attend; the caterers are not fazed by a guest list of billions!

I am looking forward to feasting this Christmas, but the most amazing earthly banquet is only a shadow of what awaits us in glory.

Thursday, 29 November 2007

FOOD 2: MADE TO EAT

Genesis 1:29 God said, “I give you every seed-bearing plant on the face of the whole earth and every tree that has fruit with seed in it. They will be yours for food.”

We were created with physical needs. We are not just spirit – we are not like the angels – we have physical bodies with physical needs. This means that God made us to be dependent. Independence is greatly valued in our culture, but everyone depends on someone else for life. A baby depends upon its mother for food and warmth and care. Children, the old and the weak all depend on others to provide for them. Less obviously, city dwellers depend upon farmers – someone actually has to grow the food that we eat – and farmers are dependent upon the earth to bring forth crops.

Ultimately all of us are dependent on God to provide for us. It is God who makes the sun shine that enables plants to grow, in the earth that He created, so that we might be fed. Every time we take a bite of food it is a sign of our dependency. The most deliberately autonomous, independent, self-conscious person shows the limits of their autonomy and independence every time they get hungry.

We are creatures, and every bite of food we take should cause us to acknowledge and praise the creator.

It is for this reason that we give thanks before meals. Saying ‘grace’ can easily descend into meaningless formalism. For this reason, over the past 30 years many Christians have stopped doing it. It can feel like an anachronism – where is the grace in saying grace?! I like to give thanks though, because it reminds me that I am a creature, sustained by the creator. I didn’t make this food, even if I prepared it. Ultimately God has supplied it. And without this food I would die, and I don’t want to die, so I am grateful for my food and I give thanks.

Wednesday, 28 November 2007

FOOD 1: FEEDING FRENZY

The past 50 years have seen huge changes in what we eat. There has never been so much food – the quantity, quality and choice of what is available to us would be beyond the imaginings of our ancestors. Food is also relatively much cheaper than ever before. A simple example: My children were complaining last week about being given pineapple for pudding one evening; they couldn’t believe that when I was their age pineapple was a twice a year treat.

Because we have such an abundance of good, cheap, attractive food, we have entirely lost our fear of famine – a spectre haunting previous generations. For most of human history famine has been the background noise for everyone, no matter where they lived and how rich they were. We might live with a sense of shadows overhanging us – climate change, terrorism, etc. – but the psychological release of not having to worry about whether we will have enough to eat has changed us culturally in profound degree.

One obvious manifestation of this is our great confusion about food. Now we don’t have to worry about whether we have enough to eat we seem to spend plenty of time worrying about all that we do eat. This isn’t helped by all the conflicting messages we receive. Grace and I enjoy a grapefruit for breakfast and a few weeks back there was a warning that grapefruit causes breast cancer. The same week there was another report that says grapefruit prevents cancer. So – which is it?!

As a nation we are treat and diet obsessed. Advertising bombards us with messages saying, “Eat this to feel good/loved/sexy/happy/popular!” and at the same time we are bombarded with other messages saying, “Go on a diet!” It is hardly surprising that many people swing between binge eating and binge dieting. And if you go on a diet, which one? The book shops will be stuffed with competing diet books in January, all promising a miracle cure for that festive excess.

Then there are the celebratory chefs and food campaigners. Gordon Ramsay swearing at people, or Jamie Oliver with his crusade for healthy school dinners, or Hugh Fiddling-Withanawl urging us to eat free-range, carefully killed, well-hung meat (BTW, the free-range saddleback pork we bought at Pilsdon was sensational!). And then there are all the food scares. Lysteria in this, salmonella in that…

As well as what we eat, we have also changed how we eat. There is a reported decline in the sale of dining room tables, as fewer people sit down for a regular family meal. Increasingly we eat ready meals, warmed in a microwave, on our own, watching the telly.

Does the Bible have anything to say about all this? I think it does, and will get to that next time…

Tuesday, 27 November 2007

RECIPE OF THE WEEK

Christmas is now less than a month away, as if anyone needs reminding. Food is a crucial aspect of the Christmas experience, so I thought I would start a short series on “What the Bible says about food.” I’ll get going with it in the next day or two, but today thought I’d share my recipe of the week with you.

Monday is my day off and Grace and I normally try to eat something nicer than normal on a Monday evening. A couple of weeks back my friends Tony and Pete went fishing and delivered several trout to us. I like fish, and am hoping that when we get to Poole we will be able to eat more fresh-caught stuff. (My friend Roger tells me that Hengistbury Head is famous for its bass fishing.) Normally we just bake or grill trout, and serve it with potato and some veg or salad. Last night I felt like experimenting, and it worked really well. Here is the recipe:

1 large trout – filleted
Finely chop a de-seeded chilli, half an onion and a clove of garlic. Sprinkle this on the trout fillets, along with seasoning and a lump of butter. Add half a lemon. Wrap in foil and place in a reasonably hot oven (180 deg C).
Dice the other half of onion, some more garlic and a leek. Put these in a pan along with some puy lentils. Cover with water and bring to the boil. Then simmer for about 25 minutes.
The fish and lentils should be ready at about the same time. Pile a good helping of lentils on a plate and place a fillet of fish on top.

Enjoy!

I thought the chilli might overwhelm the rather delicate trout, but it didn’t seem to (it would have been too much with the seeds left in though). I’ve eaten highly spiced fish in Singapore which was delicious. This is less hardcore, but made a tasty change from my normally more cautious approach with trout. And the lentils make a great alternative to potato or rice.

BY THE BOOK 2

Everyone is blogging about books - it must be all those "Books to buy for Christmas" lists in the weekend papers. The Unashamed Workman has some links you might find helpful.

Monday, 26 November 2007

JOHN PIPER & BREASTS

This is interesting. The written version is an edited (and toned down) version of the audio version, so download the whole thing. I think this is a very difficult area to address appropriately, but that Piper does a pretty good job.

Saturday, 24 November 2007

THE CAMERA NEVER LIES

My wife has just come back from a church event at which she claims numerous people were casting aspersions upon the genuineness of the photo that now accompanies this blog. Seriously folks, that really is me! Its amazing how much difference a pair of specs makes - not only do I see different, but I look different!

BY THE BOOK

Since starting my own blog I have started to read the blogs of others. One of the things I have noticed is the number of people displaying obsessive-compulsive behaviour when it comes to books. It is easy to measure spirituality by how many books you can read in a year, or, even more bizarrely, by how many feet of shelving one's library occupies.

On one level I can relate to this. I admit to a certain twitchiness when too long has gone by without me finishing a book, and I can suffer from 'reading guilt' when I consider how much great material there is out there which I have never read and probably will never read. This feeling can be compounded by the reading exploits of others. (Amazon's current top reviewer has posted reviews of 15,208 books! How does anyone do that?!)

Quantity is no indication of quality, however. I think of friends in other nations who have very restricted access to Christian books, but whose lives display a profound spirituality. Of course, I think everyone should read. There is no virtue in being ignorant, but it is possible to read very widely but never deeply. And many of us tend to fall into the trap of reading the latest thing and not reading books of real substance.

I remember the course tutor for my MA advising us that we should focus on books that had stood the test of centuries. I doubt that in 50 years time (let alone 500) anyone will be reading the titles that currently occupy the Christian bestseller lists (and certainly not this blog!). A pastor friend of mine related to a group of us his most recent visit to the local Wesley Owen bookshop. Apparently, this is named after John Owen and John Wesley, to reflect the Reformed and Arminian traditions of Evangelicalism, but my friend felt it should be renamed 'Yancey Meyer' as he could not find anything of substance on the shelves!

So, rather than reading nothing or falling into the trap of seeking justification in the quantity of what we read, better to read a few things which are really worth reading. To this end I am adding a "Read Hot" section at the bottom of my blog where I shall occasionally list books I think are really worth digging out and digging into. I am starting with Augustine's Confessions.

Friday, 23 November 2007

THANKS!

As this week has been Thanksgiving in the US, many people have been blogging about thankfulness, so it seems appropriate that I should add my thanks too.

I would like to thank the FOTH who have shown us so much love and concern over recent months.

I would like to thank the different churches that we considered moving to, who showed us amazing kindness and generosity. There were times when I wished I could just rotate between them all for the rest of my life!

I would like to thank the members of Alder Road who unanimously voted for us to join them. I don’t believe voting is a biblical method of appointing church leaders, but it is amazing how much more positive I feel about it at the moment!

And of course, all thanks must go to God. I like the way the Heidelberg Catechism begins:

Question 1. What is your only comfort in life and in death?
Answer. That I am not my own, but belong body and soul, in life and in death to my faithful Saviour, Jesus Christ. Christ has fully paid for all my sins with his precious blood, and has set me free from all the power of the devil. He also watches over me in such a way that not a hair can fall from my head without the will of my Father in heaven; in fact, all things must work together for my salvation. Because I belong to him, Christ, by his Holy Spirit assures me of eternal life and makes me wholeheartedly willing and ready from now on to live for him.

Question 2. What must you know to live and die in the joy of this comfort?
Answer. Three things: first, how great my sin and misery are; second, how I am set free from all my sins and misery; third, how I am to thank God for such redemption.


Amen!

Thursday, 22 November 2007

A BITE OF BARTH

I am reading (slowly) the last volume of Karl Barth’s monumental (its always described as monumental!) Church Dogmatics. Sometimes its good to get to grips with something really chewy. So put down that theological milkshake and get your teeth into some spiritual steak:

[The Christian] is a man whose acknowledged, recognised and confessed Lord He [Jesus] has become. He is a man to whom Jesus Christ has given not just a potential but an actual share in that history of His. Thus Jesus Christ, His history, became and is the foundation of Christian existence; this and this alone. The Christian comes from Him, from His history, from knowledge of it; he also looks back thereto. This is the ground on which he stands and walks. This is the air which he breathes. This is the word which he has in his ears before, above and after all other words. This is the light, the one light, the incomparably bright light, which illumines him.

Wednesday, 21 November 2007

WHY YOU SHOULD MOVE TO POOLE!

Good news! Apple managed to turn around my laptop repair in 24 hours, so my technology cold turkey has passed. I still have no voice though; this bug is lingering too long…

Here are ten things you might not know about Poole:

• Poole has been inhabited for over 2,500 years.
• Poole is part of the South East Dorset Conurbation, which has a population of about 400,000 people. Poole itself has a population of about 140,000.
• Between Sandbanks in the west and Hengistbury Head in the east, there are 7 miles of promenade to walk, run, cycle or skate along.
• After Sydney, Poole Harbour is the largest natural harbour in the world.
• Both the SBS and the RNLI are based in Poole Harbour.
• I was at school with Jamie Redknapp, who lives on Sandbanks.
• Sandbanks is reputed to have the highest property values, per sq. ft., of anywhere in the world. There are also some quite gritty estates in Poole, and everything in between.
• Bournemouth University, and the Bournemouth Symphony Orchestra are actually based in Poole.
• Poole has some of the best weather in the country. It enjoys 1,750 hours of sunshine each year, compared with a UK average of 1,339 hours. The average maximum and minimum temperatures for Poole are 14 and 7 deg C, compared with a UK average of 12 and 5 deg C.
• On Brittany Ferries Normandie Vitesse it takes only 2 and a quarter hours to get to Cherbourg from Poole.

Sounds like a great place to live! Here is a fantastic aerial picture of the harbour and Brownsea Island.

Tuesday, 20 November 2007

AND IT CAME TO PASS...

This blog was originally started in order to keep Friends Of The Hosier's (the FOTHful) up to date with our plans as we tried to work out where we were meant to be after New Community. In the event, I have actually had to be a bit cloaks and daggers as it wasn't really appropriate to post about the different places we were looking at, and the blog has taken on a life of its own.

But now - at last! - the wait is over. We are moving to Poole, where I will be leading Alder Road Baptist Church. We are very excited about this, and feel it is where God wants us. There has been an amazingly positive response towards us from the church, and it just seems right.

I will blog more about this in the days to come but that is probably enough for now. Also, I am still trying to shake off my man flu. And - worst of all - my laptop has had to go in for repairs. I have popped into the office to use someone elses machine to write this, but I am suffering technology cold turkey!

Saturday, 17 November 2007

NO MORE DOLLY'S

Good news from the biotech industry! As us pro-lifers have been saying all along, there is no need to produce cloned embryos in order to advance medicine.

HOMAGE TO HEATHER

I got a newsletter this week from Heather, who was a member of New Community and in February this year relocated to Zimbabwe to serve God there. Heather has done remarkably well and I thought it appropriate to sing her praises. Life is tough in Zim. The basic stuff, like food and water, is in short supply, and Heather says this about the health situation:

Nowadays if you need treatment at a Zimbabwean hospital, such as an operation, you have to bring your own supplies like IV's and medication with you, obtained elsewhere or the hospital won't treat you. I have also seen many people suffering from the affects of malnutrition and HIV related conditions, demonstrating again the ongoing needs of the country and the difficulties in being able to tackle them within the current ecomonical difficulties in the country.

Heather is planning to come back to the UK next February and then go back to Africa in May, this time to work at an orphanage to Mozambique. I think this is amazing! Moz is not at the top of most peoples “location, location, location” lists. And Heather’s vision is not only to serve in an orphanage but to build the local church. She writes:

I've been attached to Newfrontiers churches both in London and in Zimbabwe for several years now and have been impacted by their vision which is to extend God's kingdom by planting New testament churches. I have experienced in Zimbabwe how a community can be impacted and transformed by such a church being planted and although currently there is not a Newfrontiers Church in Beira, my prayer is that I can be a part of something similar in Beira in the future.

Heather, I salute you!

Thursday, 15 November 2007

MAN FLU

I have gone down with the office cold this week. I had a slight sniffle all last week, and thought I was going to get away with just a sniffle, but it started to get ugly this week. Tuesday night I didn’t really sleep as I couldn’t breathe. Last night I slept, but Grace didn’t due to my outrageous snoring. Perhaps its judgement for my harsh words about the hamster.

I’m sure everyone has now seen the man flu video, but it is brilliant!

Anyway, my cold is having a negative impact upon the old creative juices. I’ll try and get back to proper blogging tomorrow – so long as Grace keeps the nourishing soup coming…

Tuesday, 13 November 2007

REJOICE! REJOICE! GODFREY IS DEAD!

Some time ago we inherited Godfrey the hamster from one of the students at church whose landlord would not allow pets (yes, not even a hamster…).

As is the way with a new pet, great was the initial rejoicing among the children. But after about 30 minutes they hardly ever looked at him again! Godfrey was something of a bionic hamster. He had an incredible ability to escape his cage, and would take up residence under an inaccessible bookcase, from which we could hear the sound of much gnawing. Eventually we had to tape down every possible point of weakness in his cage in an attempt to contain him.

As well as great strength, Godfrey was also of great age. The chief advantage of hamsters as pets is that they normally die within two years. When we took Godfrey on he was – allegedly – already nearing his third birthday, so we assumed it would be a short affair. But die he would not.

With our plan being to move away from SE London by the beginning of 2008 we really didn’t want Godfrey to be part of our future, and I had suggested various means of disposing of him. Despite their apparent lack of interest in the rodent, the children would always outvote me if I tried to suggest taking the ultimate sanction against him.

But – glad news – we awoke this morning to find Godfrey cold and stiff in his cage.

I consider this to be a clear sign from the heavens that we are about to know with absolute clarity where and when we shall be moving. And I am also very clear that while we may at some point get a new puppy, we will be steering clear of small rodents!

Saturday, 10 November 2007

IN THE THERAPISTS CHAIR

I started reading Lindsay Camp’s blog on Thursday, only for him to announce yesterday that he is giving up blogging. Camp is a persuasive writer by profession, and his reasons for stopping his blog are persuasive. Here is the bulk of his last post:

“This will be my last post. I wonder, though, if I can persuade you to stay with me for just a few more paragraphs while I explain why I've reached this decision?

"I suppose the main reason is the obvious one: I think I'm starting to repeat myself. Of course, there's nothing wrong with a bit of repetition in persuasive writing; quite often, it's actually necessary to say the same thing in a number of slightly different ways in order to win someone round to your way of seeing things. But, after a certain point, the law of diminishing returns comes into force, and you start to bore your reader - which, as you'll know if you've read my book, is the second worst crime a persuasive writer can commit. And I'm afraid I may be rapidly approaching that point (if I haven't passed it already).

"My other reason for becoming an ex-blogger is, I think, more interesting, since it concerns the medium itself. I've enjoyed writing here very much over the last 15 months or so, but I've never been able to shake off my reservations about the form. Blogging is, for me, just a bit too easy. Take three minutes to get set up, and you're away: no need to think before you write; no quality control; no time to reflect on what you've written before sending it out into the world. No discipline, in fact, of any kind: if I chose, I could interrupt myself right now to give you my mother's famous flapjack recipe, or to share with you the poem I wrote last week. (Don't worry, I'm not going to.)

"I'm sure some would say that these are blogging's best attributes; that it's this unboundaried immediacy that gives the best examples of the form their snap, crackle and pop. But, for me, it just feels a bit self-indulgent. And I'm pretty sure I do my best work when there are constraints: a brief to be met, a deadline, a sharply defined objective.

"Anyway, I'm clear in my own mind that, in a world where there is way too much information - and where everyone has a vehemently held opinion and the means to express it - one of the biggest courtesies we can show our fellow human-beings is not to communicate with them, unless we feel an overwhelming need to do so, combined with a sincere belief that at least some of them will find what we have to communicate useful, interesting or enjoyable.”

I read in the paper today that some 4 million Britons are now blogging on a regular basis, which certainly adds strength to Camp’s case. It is also probably true that a large proportion of those 4 million are blogging as a form of therapy. I enjoy writing, and I have also found it therapeutic to have an outlet for my thoughts during what has been a turbulent and painful time. However, the more people I discover are reading my blog the more careful I realise I need to be in what I write!

Anyway, take a look at Camp’s blog, and if you are interested in writing get hold of his book, which I think is well worth the cover price.

Friday, 9 November 2007

A LITTLE MORE PERSONALITY

I have been thinking about how I react to those in leadership over me, and to Christian “Personalities.” Last week I posted a link to Mark Driscoll’s critique of Joel Osteen and since doing so have been trying to judge how much the way that I respond to Driscoll and Osteen is simply a matter of personality.

Of the two, I do find Driscoll far more attractive. We are the same age, we are both married to a woman called Grace (a different woman, you’ll understand…), both have young children (although he has gone one better than me and has 5 to my 4), both enjoy Ultimate Fighting. There is the small matter that he leads a church more than ten times the size of the one I have been leading and is clearly on a different level from me in terms of gift and ability, but that apart, there is a fair amount to connect us.

I am not nearly so familiar with Osteen but everything about his syrupy voice and Hollywood looks is enough to put me off.

The way I respond to the personalities of Driscoll and Osteen must influence how I respond to their teaching. I happen to think Driscoll’s critique of Osteen’s theology is correct, and so hope that my attitude towards Osteen would have more to do with objective theology than subjective personality. But I guess the question is, if Driscoll taught health & wealth theology would I be more inclined to listen, simply because I like his personality?!

I think the lesson of church history would be that believers have often gone done theological cul-de-sacs because they are happy to follow a leader with an attractive personality even if his theology is dodgy. So should church leaders try and be unattractive, but true?! No. But it does mean that they need to work on truth more than their hair styles, and that all of us need to take responsibility for growing in sound theology. After all, ultimately we are engaged in the pursuit of Him “in whom are hidden all the treasures of wisdom and knowledge.” (Col. 2:3)

Thursday, 8 November 2007

SHORT OF SIGHT

I have finally admitted defeat. After years of my wife saying, "You're squinting" while I have believed myself to have perfect vision, I went to the opticians last week. Short-sighted and astygmatism.

Even the six year-old could see a parable in that.

So I'm blogging through glasses, and everything is strange and new! Got them online though - £25 rather than the £250 the optician wanted to charge me. Now that is what I call clear vision!

Wednesday, 7 November 2007

SMELLING GOOD

In our family worship time around the breakfast table this morning, we read the story of Jesus being anointed by a sinful woman in Luke 7. Reading the bible together is one thing, extracting meaning from it is another. In response to my question, “What was the difference between the Pharisee and the woman?” the six year-old responded, “Women smell better than men.”

There is possibly some truth in this observation. But it wasn’t quite the answer I was looking for.

In a way though, this does illustrate the point of the story. Jesus was forever faced with people missing the obvious answer about him and coming up with spurious sidetracks. When he left the dinner party both Jesus and the woman would have carried the fragrance of expensive perfume with them. Did Simon the Pharisee ever smell as good as that sinful woman? That’s the point of the story.

Tuesday, 6 November 2007

PERSONALITY 9: SETTING THE SUPREMACY OF CHRIST OVER ALL PERSONALITY

This personality stuff has taken up more posts than I anticipated, but I have enjoyed doing it and hope it has been helpful to someone, somewhere out there!

My starting point for these posts was Paul’s admonition of the Corinthian church for their worldly attitude in being personality obsessed. He hits a high point in 1 Corinthians 3:21-23: “So then, no more boasting about men! All things are yours, whether Paul or Apollos or Cephas or the world or life or death or the present or the future— all are yours, and you are of Christ, and Christ is of God.”

How foolish, if everything belongs to us, to start picking favourites and forming factions.

What conclusions can we draw from all this?

1. Don’t allow the personality of others to limit the supremacy of Christ over all things.

The Corinthians were in danger of missing out on the blessing of God because they were limiting who they were prepared to receive that blessing from. There is a basic principle of spiritual authority here – we are meant to receive and benefit from the spiritual leadership of those God places over us. Inevitably we will all have personal preferences as to the kind of leader we most naturally like and connect with, but it is a foolish sheep who goes wandering from the flock in search of a different shepherd. Sheep who do this get eaten by wolves, fall down ravines, get blow-fly, and eventually starve to death, usually spreading gangrene to other sheep in the process!

Paul, Apollos and Peter were all very different, but they were all good men. The supremacy of Christ was made known through each of them.


2. Expect God to use you, regardless of personality.

God has a purpose for your life. Ephesians 2:10 tells us, “We are God’s workmanship, created in Christ Jesus to do good works, which God prepared in advance for us to do.” There is no personality qualification there. All of us who have found faith in Christ have got a job to do.

This doesn’t mean that we excuse our character flaws, or blunder about saying, “Well that’s just who I am.” Where there is sin in our lives we need to deal with it. And where our personalities let us down we need to allow others to help us to think about how we can best utilise our strengths and minimise our weaknesses. But it does mean that whatever our personality we do not have an excuse not to be used by God.

Christ is supreme over all things – even personality!

Monday, 5 November 2007

PERSONALITY 8: TRAINING FOR CHARACTER

In the Christian life how we finish is more important than how we start. Like an athlete who has never done any training, many come out of the blocks of conversion at amazing speed, but after a short while drop out of the race with exhaustion. In order to avoid this we need to train.

Sometimes believers never get into a training mentality because of an erroneous idea that the Holy Spirit should do what is actually their job! The Spirit does help us, but that doesn’t mean we can afford to be passive. We do need to have a training mentality – there is work, disciplines, practices we need to do, in co-operation with the Holy Spirit, that will get us spiritually fit and help us grow in character.

Unfortunately, the word “Discipline” often has negative connotations, but this should not be the case. Discipline is the foundation of success. If you want to play a tune, you need to learn the scales. If you want to win a race, you’ve got to get the training miles in. If you want to pass exams, you have to do some study. Discipline increases our effectiveness and stamina.

Discipline is actually the path to freedom.

Often I have stood on a beach and watched windsurfers fly across the water at incredible speed – they look free. On the couple of occasions I have tried windsurfing I have spent almost all my time falling into the water! It takes discipline to learn how not to fall off.

And discipline develops patterns of behaviour – endurance, stamina – that help in every area of life. For example, learning physical discipline (staying fit, not over-eating, etc.) aids mental discipline, and vice versa.

I have a regular 10k run route from my house. This takes me through Chislehurst where I have to run up Old Hill. It is a beast of a hill. Every time I run it I want to stop and walk, but I never do. And the reason I never do? Because I never have! If just once I stopped and walked, I guess that I would always stop and walk. So I have trained myself to run, and it now seems impossible that I will ever stop and walk up Old Hill. This physical discipline also helps me mentally. For example, I have never looked at internet porn. Often I am tempted to – often I would really like to – but because I have never done it, I never do it. I know that if I looked once, I would most likely start looking a lot. Running up a hill and not looking at porn might seem two unrelated things, but the discipline to do them comes from the same place – training.

So what do we need to train?

I do think we should train our bodies. We don’t need to be health and fitness fanatics, but as Paul writes, “there IS some benefit in physical training.” (1 Tim. 4:8) A lack of discipline here always gets reflected in a lack of discipline elsewhere.

We need to train our minds. This probably takes even greater effort than training our bodies; learning to think better is not easy. We are constantly bombarded with nonsense, and our minds can soak it all up uncritically. Instead, we need to train ourselves to think right, we need to “be transformed by the renewing of our mind.” (Rom. 12:2 John Piper is excellent on this.)

We need to train our emotions. This will be more or less difficult depending on our personality type. Some people are just more naturally emotionally in tune, while others find it difficult to understand their own emotions or the emotions of others. (Here’s a very funny video about this.) We have to be able to listen to our emotions, and the emotions of others; but we mustn’t be ruled by them.

We need to train our ego. Paul never seemed to have an ego problem. In fact, he makes a joke of it, in 2 Cor. 11 & 12 where he boasts about his sufferings. Paul actually had plenty of reason to let his ego go wild, but instead he recognised his weakness and found his strength in Christ.

We also need to train for spiritual development – it is the spiritual disciplines that will get you through life’s hurdles. But rather than me blogging on this, read some Dallas Willard!

Sunday, 4 November 2007

PERSONALITY 7: DEVELOPING CHARACTER

We need to recognise that every day our character is either growing or shrinking, by the decisions we make. How can we be people who make good decisions and consistently grow in godly character?

Surely, this is the very essence of discipleship. We want to be people who become increasingly Christ-like – he is the one with perfect character whom we want to reflect. But how?

Here are a few suggestions:

1. We need people who can speak candidly to us. It is very difficult to develop good character if we never allow anyone to speak into our lives. Of course, we need to find someone appropriate to speak to us – someone who is of good character themselves – and normally this will mean someone in a leadership role.

It also helps if the person speaking into our lives has some insight into the importance of personality. If you are a melancholic you will need a listener to talk to you; if you are a sanguine you will need a talker to talk to you! Some of the least helpful input I have had is from people who talk to me as though they are talking to themselves, when I am not like them! This doesn’t mean we try and find someone who only says nice things to us – we all need to be confronted and challenged at times – but it does mean a good friend is one who genuinely understands us, and doesn’t just lecture us. Excellent biblical examples of this are the way in which the prophet Nathan confronted David after his sin with Bathsheba (2 Sam. 12), and Paul’s letter to Philemon.

2. We need to grow in generosity. It is typical for us to get smaller hearted as we go through life. The older we get the more cautious, cynical and self-indulgent we tend to become. The antidote to this is to deliberately decide to get bigger rather than smaller hearted; and the way to do this is by growing in generosity.

Sin hardwires us to be more selfish than generous but new birth brings us into the generosity of God. As new creations we are treated with incredible generosity and are to respond with generosity. Generosity begets generosity: “Give, and it will be given to you. A good measure, pressed down, shaken together and running over, will be poured into your lap. For with the measure you use, it will be measured to you.” (Luke 6:38)

Practically, what does this mean? For me, it means that the tithe is the beginning of generosity. Giving away ten percent of our income is the starting point – and going beyond the tithe is a pursuit of spiritual devotion. This pursuit of spiritual devotion then becomes a pattern for all of life, and not just what we do with our money. Pursuing this must mean being generous.

3. We need to learn discipline. Some people are naturally highly gifted, but in order to succeed gifting alone is not enough. Athletes have to train and discipline themselves in order to win races. Gifting is important, but without discipline you’re going to get beat.

Saturday, 3 November 2007

PERSONALITY 6: PERSONALITY & CHARACTER

That Peterson quote again: “In the jargon of the day, we pray: ‘sacrifice is not one of my gifts – I want to serve God with my strength, with my giftedness.’ It’s a strange thing, but sacrifice never seems to show up on anyone’s Myers-Briggs profile.”

Understanding our personality is helpful, but it will only take us so far. We also need to develop character – it is godly character that will enable us to make sacrifices.

How can we distinguish personality and character? Often, the two terms are used interchangeably, but I think they are different. Two common mistakes we make are to criticize a character flaw in someone else, when in actual fact it is just their personality, or to excuse as, “its just my personality” what is actually sin!

So, some definitions.

As described in an earlier post, personality is about how others see us, as well as how we respond to circumstances. In contrast, character is more about how we are morally. D.L. Moody is quoted as saying, “Character is what you are in the dark.” It is possible to have an attractive personality, while being of corrupt character.

We tend to respond to people’s personality but need to learn to respond primarily to their character.

The good news is that we have much more control over our character than we do over our personality. Our personality is fixed by our DNA and our upbringing and experiences, while character is a result of our decisions. God can use any personality – character is always the limiting factor. So we need to be people whose character shapes our personality more than the other way around.

How can we develop godly character?

An important part of character development is learning to handle our personality! We need to learn to handle the temptations our personality leads us in to. We need to allow character to be the frame around which we build our gifts, rather than simply relying upon the power of our personalities.

The Corinthians had lost sight of this frame and foundation. We can see this in 1 Cor. 3:10-13, where Paul writes: “By the grace God has given me, I laid a foundation as an expert builder, and someone else is building on it. But each one should be careful how he builds. For no-one can lay any foundation other than the one already laid, which is Jesus Christ. If any man builds on this foundation using gold, silver, costly stones, wood, hay or straw, his work will be shown for what it is, because the Day will bring it to light. It will be revealed with fire, and the fire will test the quality of each man's work.”

The foundation Paul lay had nothing to do with personality – it had to do with the person of Jesus Christ. And how we build on this foundation is not about personality.

Whatever the limitations of Paul’s personality he grew in character – he finished strong. We can see this in 2 Tim. 4:6-8 where Paul, in a dungeon and knowing he will soon die, writes:

“For I am already being poured out like a drink offering, and the time has come for my departure. I have fought the good fight, I have finished the race, I have kept the faith. Now there is in store for me the crown of righteousness, which the Lord, the righteous Judge, will award to me on that day— and not only to me, but also to all who have longed for his appearing.”

Paul didn’t finish his race strong by chance. He got there strong because of the decisions he made. Decisions which day by day positively shaped his character.

Friday, 2 November 2007

PERSONALITY 5: TIGHT FIT

Personality, like body type, is to a large extent fixed by the time we reach our 20’s.

While there are some things we can do to adjust our appearance – the clothes we wear, hairstyle, whether we work at our fitness or get fat, etc. – there is nothing we can do about the fundamentals. For example, I would like to be six foot tall, but the reality is that I am 5’11.5’’! I can wear shoes with a heel to get that extra half-inch, but I am never going to be six foot. And because it sounds lame to describe my height as 5’11.5’’, I always say I am 5’11”, which is a whole inch shorter than six foot!

If we try too hard to change the fundamentals of our appearance, it always backfires. The bald man who develops a massive scrape-over looks ridiculous – no-one is fooled! Michael Jackson looks ridiculous.

And I believe it is the same with personality.

We can modify our personality, but fundamentally it is fixed. If we try too hard to be who we are not it always backfires – no-one is fooled.

The trouble is that just as many of us are dissatisfied with our physical appearance, so many of us are dissatisfied with our personality. We would like to have the kind of personality that lights up every room we walk into and causes everyone to love us and think we are wonderful.

But not many people are like that. So we try and develop a ‘personality scrape-over.’ And no-one is fooled.

Most of us did not have the kind of personality that made us the most popular kid in school, and inevitably this grates. Most people go through their teens thinking, “I wish I looked like him/her” and “I wish I had a personality like him/her.” We can carry this attitude into adulthood, and it is always destructive.

The question we need to resolve is, Do we get our validation from people or from Christ? If our validation is from people then it is likely we will always be fighting our personality. If it is from Christ then we can learn his acceptance of us. I think Paul would have had plenty of reason to be uncomfortable with himself, but instead he comes across as a man who knew he was validated because he was in Christ:

1 Cor. 15:10 "By the grace of God I am what I am, and his grace to me was not without effect."

Paul had learned to be comfortable with his personality – even if he wasn’t as ‘hail-fellow-well-met’ as Peter or as impressive looking as Apollos. No personality type is perfect – sanguines easily slip from being entertaining to being merely irritating; cholerics can be so opinionated they intimidate everyone else; melancholics can be so creative they just cause confusion; phlegmatics can be so passive that other personality types want to slap them…

The different tests I have taken have said I have a personality type similar to as wide a range of people as St Paul, Margaret Thatcher, Picasso and Elvis! In the end – and by the grace of God – I just have to learn to be content with being Matthew Hosier. There’s not much I can do about my personality, but there is certainly a lot I can do about my character. I would like to reflect Paul in that respect, because the thing that can indisputably be said about Paul is that he had character.

Thursday, 1 November 2007

PERSONALITY 4: SINNING WITH YOUR PERSONALITY

While there is no one ideal, sanctified personality type, personality is hugely important. It not only affects how others perceive us, but how we respond to different circumstances. One important lesson we need to learn is that we are likely to sin in line with our personality.

Temptation is unlikely to be effective if it is counter-personality. Instead, we are tempted with things that are appealing to our personality. To quote John Owen again: “He who watches not this thoroughly, who is not exactly skilled in the knowledge of himself, will never be disentangled from one temptation or another all his days.”

From what we know of Paul and Peter from the scriptures we can make an educated guess about where they were most vulnerable to temptation.

Peter’s weakness would have been a desire for popularity, a tendency to speak foolishly, and the need to appear respectable.

Paul’s weakness would be to jump with both feet into issues that needed resolving, rather than sometimes ‘finessing’ the situation.

Or think of King David. His sin was out of character (the man after God’s own heart), but it was in line with his personality. Clearly he was a man of high energy, including high sexual energy. Also, he was a strategic thinker. So it is not surprising that his sin was sexual, and that he then used his strategic ability to ‘solve’ the problem of Uriah.

We sin in line with our personality. Quiet, ordered people quietly and orderly fiddle their tax return. Type A leaders have Type A affairs (Bill Clinton – the ultimate sanguine?). Aggressive people get into fights. Timid people don’t deal with issues.

The point of this is that we need to know our weaknesses and guard against them, and the way to know our weaknesses is to understand our personality.